Service animals must be allowed

Complainant alleged Respondent’s ordinance discriminated against disabled persons who require the use of service animals. A Resolution Conference was held on December 15, 2023, during which the parties reached an agreement. Complainant agreed to withdraw her complaint, waive further investigation and administrative procedures before the Commission, as well as agreed not to sue Respondent for allegations alleged in her complaint. Respondent agreed to waive all further investigation, as well as adopted an ordinance amending its existing animal control and protection code as it relates to service animals. On or around February 5th, 2024, both parties signed the Pre-Determination Settlement Agreement, and the case was subsequently closed.